Summary
This code explainer turns a pasted snippet into a plain-English outline: the language, each function and what its name suggests, a cyclomatic complexity score, and flags such as empty catch blocks, eval calls and hardcoded secrets. It is a rule-based reader, not a language model, so it describes structure rather than intent. Complexity follows McCabe's measure, where 10 or less per function is the recommended limit. The analysis runs in your browser and your code is never sent anywhere.
Paste Code, Get a Plain-English Outline of What It Does
This free code explainer reads a snippet in your browser and returns its functions, decision paths, error handling and red flags, so you know where to look before you read line by line.

How to use the outline
-
1
Paste the snippet
One function or one file works best. Past a few hundred lines the outline stops being a summary and becomes a list.
-
2
Check the lead sentence
It names the language, counts functions and gives a complexity score. A score above 10 means the code has too many paths to hold in your head at once.
-
3
Read the walkthrough
Each function gets one line: what its name suggests, how long it is, how many paths it has, and whether it loops, waits or handles failures.
-
4
Open the flags first
If the tool lists an empty error handler or a credential-like string, start there. Those are the lines most likely to hurt you later.
What the explainer actually measures
Structure from syntax
It strips comments and strings, then matches function definitions, imports, classes, loops and branches for the language it detects. No guessing about what the code is for, only what it contains.
Complexity you can verify
The score is cyclomatic complexity: one plus every if, loop, case, catch and boolean operator. It is the same count a linter would give you, and the NIST structured testing report suggests keeping a function at 10 or below.
Flags that match real bugs
Eval or exec calls, empty catch blocks, hardcoded secrets, TODO notes, nesting past four levels and functions over 40 lines. Each rule exists because it points at code that is easy to misread.
A snippet explainer answers "what is in here", not "why is it here"
The question a new engineer asks is rarely "what does this loop do". It is "why does the billing service call this function, and who else depends on it". A pasted snippet cannot answer that, because the answer lives in other files. This tool is built for the first pass: you have a function open, you have five minutes, and you want to know whether it is a ten-line helper or a tangle with six exit paths. It gives you that in a second and tells you where the risk is. For the second question you need search across the whole repository. That is the gap between reading one function and understanding how a system is wired, and it is where most onboarding time goes.
- Use it on a single function or file, not a whole service
- Treat the flags as prompts to look closer, not as findings
- Switch to repo-wide search when the question is about callers and dependencies
Questions about the code explainer
Is this code explainer free, and does my code leave my browser?
Is this an AI model that understands my code?
How is the complexity score calculated?
Which languages does it support?
Why does it flag things like empty catch blocks and TODO comments?
What is the difference between this and asking an AI chat about my code?
Can I use it to review a pull request?
Understand the whole repo, not just one snippet
codebasechat answers questions about your codebase in plain English, with the files and call sites that back each answer.